Occam's razor, or the Law of Parsimony, says that given two theories with equal explanatory power, we should generally prefer the one that is simpler.
When we talk about the history of cosmology, we usually get a short paragraph on the Ptolemaic (or geocentric) model of the solar system before moving triumphantly to the Copernican (or heliocentric) model. We happily accept the implication that understanding the Earth moves around the Sun shows we're much more sophisticated than our benighted ancestors. But what we miss in the gloss is that astronomers used the Ptolemaic system to prepare astrological charts for 1500 years. Put another way, a model that places our planet at the center and describes the apparent motions of celestial bodies around it isn't wrong. So why do we glibly say that the Copernican model is better? Because it's simpler. Occam's razor, Q.E.D.
Elegance, as a dimension of beauty, can be inelegantly defined as maximum effect for minimum effort.
The lengths to which one must go to pick up a weak radar signal |
The idea of elegance is more complicated in writing because there was a time when, 'ornate,' lived in the same neighborhood. Then the cultural pendulum swung away and we came to celebrate inelegance as, 'gritty,' and more realistic. But the elegance we're examining here is a deeper matter of art and craft: everything from gritty realism to lofty ideal can be expressed elegantly.
Consider some of the synonyms: refinement, clarity, purity, ease, grace.
Elegant writing, as with all made things that are beautiful, is like the Zen garden where a bit of sand and stone become oceans of meaning.
Image: Bill Longshaw / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
I very much enjoyed reading this post, Deren. As always, your spot on. And the last sentence is a gem: "Elegant writing, as with all made things that are beautiful, is like the Zen garden where a bit of sand and stone become oceans of meaning."
ReplyDeleteI'm posting it on my FB wall.
Michael,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your kind words, and for the FB shout-out.